Cespe UnB

Editorial Assistants:
W. Abrahão
G. Oliveira
L. Salgueiro

Editorial Technical Support:
D. H. Diaz
M. A. Gomez
J. Barbosa

Editorial management and production:
SOLGRAF Editora
solgraf@gmail.com






95/105= 0.91


1,1

Application of computer-assisted image analysis for identifying and quantifying liver fibrosis in an experimental model


doi: 10.6062/jcis.2011.02.02.0041 (Free PDF)

Authors

Luciana Barros Sant'Anna , Nilson Sant'Anna and Ornella Parolini

Abstract

Liver fibrosis and resultant cirrhosis are amongst the most common outcomes of chronic liver diseases. Currently, liver transplantation remains the only effective treatment. Thus, a reliable and objective method is fundamental for quantifying fibrosis adequately, which is essential to prognosis, diagnosis and evaluation of response to antifibrotic therapies. Visual analysis of biological samples using semiquantitative scoring systems have been described, but all are time-consuming, qualitative, and produce partially subjective fibrosis evaluations with only moderate accuracy. While numerous commercial software packages exist for image analysis, many of these packages are designed for very specific purposes, are expensive and proprietary, meaning that the underlying methods of analysis are hidden from the researcher. On the other hand, the design of the free software ImageJ/National Institutes of Health (NIH) Image is geared more toward the analysis of individual images (comparable to Adobe Photoshop) rather than flexible, high-throughput work. Toward the aim of identifying alternative analytical approaches for precise quantification of a large number of histological images of liver fibrosis, this paper describes the configuration and use of an open-source automated image analysis software, CellProfiler, for quantification of fibrosis induced in rats. Once fibrosis had been established, liver samples were collected, histologically processed and subjected to CellProfiler image analysis, which automatically identifies and isolates fibrosis according to staining, and then measures the area occupied by fibrosis over the total liver area examined. CellProfiler was shown to be an objective, precise and rapid method that allowed simultaneous quantification of fibrosis in all six hundred histological images of injured liver examined, at a rate of  10 s/image. This novel tool might be of special value to allow the drawing of valid conclusions regarding the applicability of regenerative therapies to treat liver fibrosis in experimental studies, and also opens the way for further investigations aimed the extending the use of CellProfiler to other tissue assays.

Keywords

computational biology, automated image analysis, image processing, CellProfiler software, liver fibrosis.

References

[1] PINZANI M & ROMBOUTS K 2004. Liver fibrosis: from the bench to clinical targets. Digestive and liver disease, 36: 231-242.

[2] HENDERSON NC & FORBES SJ. 2008. Hepatic fibrogenesis: from within and outwith. Toxicology, 254: 130-135.

[3] DAI LJ, LI HY, GUAN LX, RITCHIE G & ZHOU JX. 2009. The therapeutic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on hepatic cirrhosis. Stem Cell Research, 2: 16-25.

[4] KNODELL RG, ISHAK KG, BLACK WC, CHEN TS, CRAIG R, KAPLOWITZ N ET AL. 1981. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology, 1: 431-5.

[5] SCHEUER PJ. 1991. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. Journal of Hepatology, 13: 372-374.

[6] DESMET VI, GERBER M, HOOFNAGLE JH, MAIMSM& SCHEUER PJ. 1994. Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading and staging. Hepatology, 19: 1513-20.

[7] CHEVALLIER M, GUERRET S, CHOSSEGROS E, GERARD F & GRIMAUD J-A. 1994. A histological semi-quantitative scoring system for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis in needle liver biopsy specimens: comparison with morphometric studies. Hepatology, 20: 349-55.

[8] MASSEROLI M, CABALLERO T, O'VALLE F, DEL MORAL RM, PÉREZ-MILENA A& DEL MORAL RG. 2000. Automatic quantification of liver fibrosis: design and validation of a new image analysis method: comparation with semi-quantitative indexes of fibrosis. Journal of Hepatology, 32: 453-464.

[9] GOLDIN RD, GOLDIN JG, BURT AD, DHILLON PA, HUBSCHER S, WYATT J & PATEL N. 1996. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation in the histopathological assessment of chronic viral hepatitis. Journal of Hepatology, 25: 649-654.

[10] WESTIN J, LAGGING LM, WEJSTAL R, NORKRANS G & DHILLON AP. 1999. Interobserver study of liver histopathology using the Ishak score in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Liver, 19: 183-187.

[11] BEDOSSA E, BIOULAC-SAGE E, CALLARD E, CHEVALLIER M, DEGOTT C, DEUGNIER Y ET AL. 1994. Intraobserver and interobserver variations in liver biopsy interpretation in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology, 20: 15-20.

[12] LAMPRECHT MR, SABATINI DM & CARPENTER AE. 2007. Cell- Profiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. Biotechniques, 42: 71-75.

[13] KAGE M, SHIMAMATU K, NAKASHIIA E, KOJIRO M, INOUE O & YANO M. 1997. Long-term evolution of fibrosis from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis C: morphometric analysis of repeated biopsies. Hepatology, 25: 1028-31.

[14] CABALLERO T, PEREZ-MILENA A, MASSEROLI M, O'VALLE F, SALMERON FJ, DEL MORAL RM & SANCHEZ-SALGADO G. 2001. Liver fibrosis assessment with semiquantitative indexes and image analysis quantification in sustained-responder and non-responder interferon-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C. Journal of Hepatology, 34: 740-747.

[15] DAHAB GM, KHERIZA MM, EL-BELTAGI HM, FOUDA AM & ELDIN OA. 2004. Digital quantification of fibrosis in liver biopsy sections: description of a new method by Photoshop software. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 19: 78-85.

[16] MATALKA II, AL-JARRAH OM & MANASRAH TM. 2006. Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis: a novel automated image analysis method. Liver International, 26: 1054-1064.

[17] SELINUMMI J, SEPPALA J, YLI-HARJA O & PUHAKKAJA. 2005. Software for quantification of labeled bacteria from digital microscope images by automated image analysis. BioTechniques, 39: 859-863.

[18] CARPENTER AE, JONES TR, LAMPRECHT MR, CLARKE, KANG IH, FRIMAN O, GUERTIN DA, CHANG JH, LINDQUIST RA, MOFFAT J, GOLLAND P & SABATINI DM. 2006. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biology, 7: R100.

[19] ABRAMOFF MD, MAGALHAES PJ & RAM SJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International, 11: 36-42.

[20] KOUNTOURAS J, BILLING BH & SCHEUER PJ. 1984. Prolonged bile duct obstruction: a new experimental model for cirrhoses in the rat. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 65: 305-11.

[21] LI MK & CRAWFORD JM. 2004. The pathology of cholestasis. Seminars in Liver Disease, 24: 21-42.

Search










Combining wavelets and linear spectral mixture model for MODIS satellite sensor time-series analysis
doi: 10.6062/jcis.2008.01.01.0005
Freitas and Shimabukuro(Free PDF)

Riddled basins in complex physical and biological systems
doi: 10.6062/jcis.2009.01.02.0009
Viana et al.(Free PDF)

Use of ordinary Kriging algorithm and wavelet analysis to understanding the turbidity behavior in an Amazon floodplain
doi: 10.6062/jcis.2008.01.01.0006
Alcantara.(Free PDF)

A new multi-particle collision algorithm for optimization in a high performance environment
doi: 10.6062/jcis.2008.01.01.0001
Luz et al.((Free PDF)

Reviewer Guidelines
(Under Construction)
Advertisers/Sponsors
Advertises Media Information